India’s aviation story has been one of rapid growth for much of the past decade. More passengers are flying, new airports have opened and airlines have placed some of the biggest aircraft orders in the history of the country’s commercial aviation industry.
For a government that has made aviation part of its broader economic growth story, the numbers have been encouraging.
But the mood has changed.
Air India is facing renewed scrutiny over safety and management practices. IndiGo has dealt with its own operational problems. Airlines are losing billions of dollars as fuel prices rise and geopolitical disruptions force longer routes. And behind all of it sits a market where two carriers control almost the entire domestic sector.
The result is an uncomfortable question for India: has the country’s aviation industry grown faster than the systems responsible for supporting it?
That question is becoming harder to avoid.
The growth story is still enormous
There is no denying how quickly Indian aviation has expanded.
Indian airlines carried around 167 million passengers last year, more than twice the number recorded a decade earlier. More than 70 airports have been added over the past ten years, while airlines have ordered roughly 1,500 aircraft.
Those figures have transformed expectations for the Indian market.
For years, India was seen as a country with enormous potential but an underdeveloped airline industry. That is no longer the case. Passenger demand has grown substantially, international travel has increased and airlines are competing for a much larger pool of customers.
Air India, under the Tata Group, is undergoing a major transformation, while IndiGo has built one of the largest airline networks in the country.
The problem is that growth brings its own demands.
Airlines need enough trained pilots and engineers. Airports need capacity. Maintenance organisations need to expand. Air traffic management has to cope with more aircraft. Regulators have to keep up with increasingly complicated operations.
If those pieces do not develop together, pressure eventually appears somewhere in the system.
India is now seeing some of that pressure.
Air India remains under the microscope
Air India has faced particularly intense scrutiny since last year’s fatal crash involving a Boeing 787 travelling to London, which killed 241 people on board.
The airline has been trying to rebuild its image and operations while simultaneously pursuing an enormous expansion programme.
Then came another troubling incident.
Earlier this month, an Air India flight from Phuket to New Delhi reportedly plunged about 91 metres, leaving 24 passengers injured.
The incident would have attracted attention under any circumstances. It received even greater scrutiny following reports that the captain tested positive for marijuana after landing.
Air India responded by ordering a one-time drug screening of its pilots.
An investigation into the incident is expected to establish what caused the sudden loss of altitude and whether there were any contributing operational factors.
The drug-test report, meanwhile, has raised a separate question about oversight.
For an airline attempting to restore confidence after a fatal accident, even an unrelated incident involving crew conduct can become a serious reputational problem.
And Air India already has plenty on its plate.
Safety concerns go beyond one incident
A separate audit of Air India identified around 100 safety lapses, according to a parliamentary panel report. Seven of those findings reportedly required urgent corrective action, while the report also pointed to recurring training gaps involving Boeing 787 and 777 pilots.
That is significant for an airline that is expanding its long-haul operation.
Air India is adding aircraft, reopening international routes and integrating operations following its combination with Vistara. The airline is effectively trying to become a major global carrier while rebuilding processes that had deteriorated during years of government ownership.
That is a difficult balancing act.
Shakti Lumba, a former airline operations chief, has described the airline’s safety culture as lax and argued that simply complying with rules after something goes wrong does not amount to a genuine safety culture.
The criticism touches on a broader issue in aviation.
Safety is not created by a checklist alone. It depends on training, staffing, reporting systems, management oversight and the willingness of employees to flag problems before they become serious.
That becomes even more important when an airline is growing rapidly.
IndiGo’s problems tell a different story
India’s aviation difficulties are not limited to Air India.
IndiGo, the country’s largest airline, faced widespread cancellations last year after failing to adequately prepare for new pilot fatigue regulations.
The episode exposed the delicate relationship between crew availability and airline schedules.
A carrier operating hundreds of flights every day cannot simply absorb a shortage of pilots. A change in rest requirements can affect rosters, aircraft utilisation and the number of flights that can be operated.
The resulting disruption raised questions about both airline planning and regulatory preparedness.
It also placed India’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation, or DGCA, under renewed scrutiny.
Some industry figures have accused the regulator of being too accommodating toward airlines and not sufficiently forceful in enforcing rules.
That criticism matters because India’s airline market has become so concentrated.
Two airlines now dominate India
Air India and IndiGo together account for roughly nine out of every 10 domestic airline seats.
For passengers, that means there are fewer meaningful alternatives when one of the two major carriers experiences disruption.
For regulators, the concentration creates an even more complicated problem.
A regulator can impose penalties or operational restrictions on an airline, but taking strong action against a carrier that handles a huge share of the country’s passengers can have consequences far beyond the company itself.
India did not arrive at this position because other airlines were unwilling to compete.
The country’s aviation history includes a long list of airlines that failed, were sold or disappeared from the market. Seven major airlines have either collapsed or been sold during the past two decades.
That has left IndiGo and Air India with an extraordinary degree of influence.
A large airline can bring economies of scale and improve connectivity. But when the market becomes too concentrated, competition becomes harder and disruptions can affect millions of passengers.
The government has acknowledged the problem. It has previously said India needs five major airlines and has approved plans for two new carriers.
Whether those new airlines can survive is another matter.
The economics are getting tougher
The timing could hardly be worse for India’s airlines.
ICRA has estimated that Indian carriers could collectively lose almost US$4 billion during the current fiscal year.
Air India’s losses more than doubled to around US$2.3 billion in the last financial year, while IndiGo has reported losses for two consecutive quarters.
Several factors are contributing to the pressure.
The closure of Pakistani airspace has forced some airlines to take longer routes since tensions between India and Pakistan escalated. That means more fuel burn and longer flight times.
Jet fuel prices have also been pushed higher by conflict and instability in the Middle East.
For an airline, those costs add up quickly.
Fuel is one of the biggest expenses in commercial aviation. A longer route can mean higher fuel consumption, additional crew costs and less efficient use of an aircraft.
That is particularly painful for airlines that have spent years planning aggressive expansion.
Big aircraft orders are no longer the whole story
India’s huge aircraft orders were once a symbol of confidence.
They still are, to some extent.
But an order book is not the same thing as a profitable fleet.
IndiGo recently ended its wide-body operations, while Air India is reportedly considering delays to deliveries of as many as 500 aircraft.
That would be a significant change in direction.
The industry had been operating on the assumption that India’s growing passenger market would absorb enormous amounts of new capacity. But airlines now have to be more careful about where that capacity goes and how much money each route generates.
An aircraft that is not earning enough can become a liability very quickly.
This is where India’s aviation ambitions meet the industry’s difficult economics.
More airlines may not be enough
The government is considering ways to encourage new competition, including examining whether restrictions preventing airport operators from owning airlines should be relaxed.
Such a change could potentially attract large business groups into the airline market.
But more investors will not automatically make Indian aviation healthier.
New airlines still have to contend with high operating costs, expensive airport infrastructure, fuel prices and intense fare competition. They also need experienced management teams and enough capital to survive the early years, when losses can be substantial.
That is why simply creating more airline licences may not solve the problem.
India needs carriers that can survive.
It also needs a regulatory system capable of treating large and small operators according to the same safety standards.
India still has a huge aviation opportunity
None of these problems changes the underlying opportunity.
India is likely to remain one of the world’s most important aviation markets. A growing economy, a large population, rising incomes and increasing demand for both domestic and international travel provide airlines with a market that few other countries can match.
The danger is assuming that demand alone guarantees success.
It does not.
India has already demonstrated that it can build airports, attract aircraft orders and put more people in the air. The next challenge is harder: creating an aviation system that can handle that scale consistently.
That means investing in pilot and engineer training, strengthening safety oversight, improving operational planning and creating an environment where more airlines can compete without immediately running into financial trouble.
The country’s aviation boom is therefore entering a different stage.
The easy part was getting more people to fly.
The harder part will be making sure the airlines carrying them are safe, financially sustainable and properly regulated.
For India, that may be the real test of whether its aviation ambitions can live up to the optimism that surrounded them only a year ago.
For more on similar developments, see: India’s aviation story has been one of rapid growth for much of the past decade. More passengers are flying, new airports have opened and airlines have placed some of the biggest aircraft orders in the history of the country’s commercial aviation industry.
For a government that has made aviation part of its broader economic growth story, the numbers have been encouraging.
But the mood has changed.
Air India is facing renewed scrutiny over safety and management practices. IndiGo has dealt with its own operational problems. Airlines are losing billions of dollars as fuel prices rise and geopolitical disruptions force longer routes. And behind all of it sits a market where two carriers control almost the entire domestic sector.
The result is an uncomfortable question for India: has the country’s aviation industry grown faster than the systems responsible for supporting it?
That question is becoming harder to avoid.
The growth story is still enormous
There is no denying how quickly Indian aviation has expanded.
Indian airlines carried around 167 million passengers last year, more than twice the number recorded a decade earlier. More than 70 airports have been added over the past ten years, while airlines have ordered roughly 1,500 aircraft.
Those figures have transformed expectations for the Indian market.
For years, India was seen as a country with enormous potential but an underdeveloped airline industry. That is no longer the case. Passenger demand has grown substantially, international travel has increased and airlines are competing for a much larger pool of customers.
Air India, under the Tata Group, is undergoing a major transformation, while IndiGo has built one of the largest airline networks in the country.
The problem is that growth brings its own demands.
Airlines need enough trained pilots and engineers. Airports need capacity. Maintenance organisations need to expand. Air traffic management has to cope with more aircraft. Regulators have to keep up with increasingly complicated operations.
If those pieces do not develop together, pressure eventually appears somewhere in the system.
India is now seeing some of that pressure.
Air India remains under the microscope
Air India has faced particularly intense scrutiny since last year’s fatal crash involving a Boeing 787 travelling to London, which killed 241 people on board.
The airline has been trying to rebuild its image and operations while simultaneously pursuing an enormous expansion programme.
Then came another troubling incident.
Earlier this month, an Air India flight from Phuket to New Delhi reportedly plunged about 91 metres, leaving 24 passengers injured.
The incident would have attracted attention under any circumstances. It received even greater scrutiny following reports that the captain tested positive for marijuana after landing.
Air India responded by ordering a one-time drug screening of its pilots.
An investigation into the incident is expected to establish what caused the sudden loss of altitude and whether there were any contributing operational factors.
The drug-test report, meanwhile, has raised a separate question about oversight.
For an airline attempting to restore confidence after a fatal accident, even an unrelated incident involving crew conduct can become a serious reputational problem.
And Air India already has plenty on its plate.
Safety concerns go beyond one incident
A separate audit of Air India identified around 100 safety lapses, according to a parliamentary panel report. Seven of those findings reportedly required urgent corrective action, while the report also pointed to recurring training gaps involving Boeing 787 and 777 pilots.
That is significant for an airline that is expanding its long-haul operation.
Air India is adding aircraft, reopening international routes and integrating operations following its combination with Vistara. The airline is effectively trying to become a major global carrier while rebuilding processes that had deteriorated during years of government ownership.
That is a difficult balancing act.
Shakti Lumba, a former airline operations chief, has described the airline’s safety culture as lax and argued that simply complying with rules after something goes wrong does not amount to a genuine safety culture.
The criticism touches on a broader issue in aviation.
Safety is not created by a checklist alone. It depends on training, staffing, reporting systems, management oversight and the willingness of employees to flag problems before they become serious.
That becomes even more important when an airline is growing rapidly.
IndiGo’s problems tell a different story
India’s aviation difficulties are not limited to Air India.
IndiGo, the country’s largest airline, faced widespread cancellations last year after failing to adequately prepare for new pilot fatigue regulations.
The episode exposed the delicate relationship between crew availability and airline schedules.
A carrier operating hundreds of flights every day cannot simply absorb a shortage of pilots. A change in rest requirements can affect rosters, aircraft utilisation and the number of flights that can be operated.
The resulting disruption raised questions about both airline planning and regulatory preparedness.
It also placed India’s Directorate General of Civil Aviation, or DGCA, under renewed scrutiny.
Some industry figures have accused the regulator of being too accommodating toward airlines and not sufficiently forceful in enforcing rules.
That criticism matters because India’s airline market has become so concentrated.
Two airlines now dominate India
Air India and IndiGo together account for roughly nine out of every 10 domestic airline seats.
For passengers, that means there are fewer meaningful alternatives when one of the two major carriers experiences disruption.
For regulators, the concentration creates an even more complicated problem.
A regulator can impose penalties or operational restrictions on an airline, but taking strong action against a carrier that handles a huge share of the country’s passengers can have consequences far beyond the company itself.
India did not arrive at this position because other airlines were unwilling to compete.
The country’s aviation history includes a long list of airlines that failed, were sold or disappeared from the market. Seven major airlines have either collapsed or been sold during the past two decades.
That has left IndiGo and Air India with an extraordinary degree of influence.
A large airline can bring economies of scale and improve connectivity. But when the market becomes too concentrated, competition becomes harder and disruptions can affect millions of passengers.
The government has acknowledged the problem. It has previously said India needs five major airlines and has approved plans for two new carriers.
Whether those new airlines can survive is another matter.
The economics are getting tougher
The timing could hardly be worse for India’s airlines.
ICRA has estimated that Indian carriers could collectively lose almost US$4 billion during the current fiscal year.
Air India’s losses more than doubled to around US$2.3 billion in the last financial year, while IndiGo has reported losses for two consecutive quarters.
Several factors are contributing to the pressure.
The closure of Pakistani airspace has forced some airlines to take longer routes since tensions between India and Pakistan escalated. That means more fuel burn and longer flight times.
Jet fuel prices have also been pushed higher by conflict and instability in the Middle East.
For an airline, those costs add up quickly.
Fuel is one of the biggest expenses in commercial aviation. A longer route can mean higher fuel consumption, additional crew costs and less efficient use of an aircraft.
That is particularly painful for airlines that have spent years planning aggressive expansion.
Big aircraft orders are no longer the whole story
India’s huge aircraft orders were once a symbol of confidence.
They still are, to some extent.
But an order book is not the same thing as a profitable fleet.
IndiGo recently ended its wide-body operations, while Air India is reportedly considering delays to deliveries of as many as 500 aircraft.
That would be a significant change in direction.
The industry had been operating on the assumption that India’s growing passenger market would absorb enormous amounts of new capacity. But airlines now have to be more careful about where that capacity goes and how much money each route generates.
An aircraft that is not earning enough can become a liability very quickly.
This is where India’s aviation ambitions meet the industry’s difficult economics.
More airlines may not be enough
The government is considering ways to encourage new competition, including examining whether restrictions preventing airport operators from owning airlines should be relaxed.
Such a change could potentially attract large business groups into the airline market.
But more investors will not automatically make Indian aviation healthier.
New airlines still have to contend with high operating costs, expensive airport infrastructure, fuel prices and intense fare competition. They also need experienced management teams and enough capital to survive the early years, when losses can be substantial.
That is why simply creating more airline licences may not solve the problem.
India needs carriers that can survive.
It also needs a regulatory system capable of treating large and small operators according to the same safety standards.
India still has a huge aviation opportunity
None of these problems changes the underlying opportunity.
India is likely to remain one of the world’s most important aviation markets. A growing economy, a large population, rising incomes and increasing demand for both domestic and international travel provide airlines with a market that few other countries can match.
The danger is assuming that demand alone guarantees success.
It does not.
India has already demonstrated that it can build airports, attract aircraft orders and put more people in the air. The next challenge is harder: creating an aviation system that can handle that scale consistently.
That means investing in pilot and engineer training, strengthening safety oversight, improving operational planning and creating an environment where more airlines can compete without immediately running into financial trouble.
The country’s aviation boom is therefore entering a different stage.
The easy part was getting more people to fly.
The harder part will be making sure the airlines carrying them are safe, financially sustainable and properly regulated.
For India, that may be the real test of whether its aviation ambitions can live up to the optimism that surrounded them only a year ago.
For more on similar developments, see: Embraer E-Jets Gain India DGCA Approval for Growth
Leave a Reply